Compare
Compare models
Up to four models side by side — specs, capabilities, every covered benchmark, provenance and field context. Best value per row is highlighted.
Overview
Frontier Elo2426.41848.3
Overall rank#46#100
Benchmarks tested11 / 1709 / 170
Categories covered4/75/7
Benchmark wins40
Elo per $ out1731100
Specifications
OrganizationOpenAIDeepSeek
FamilyGPT-5.2DeepSeek-V3
ReleasedDec 2025 · 9mo agoAug 2025 · 13mo ago
Statusreleaseddeprecated · Thinking · variant
Succeeds—DeepSeek-V3-0324
WeightsClosedOpen weights
LicenseProprietary · ProprietaryMIT · Permissive
ArchitectureUndisclosed architecture (presumed dense transformer, reasoning-tuned); shipped as Instant/Thinking/Pro tiersMixture-of-Experts (671B total / 37B active) — DeepSeekMoE + Multi-head Latent Attention, hybrid think/non-think chat template
Parametersundisclosed671B·37Ba
Context400K128K
Modalitiestext · visiontext
Languages——
Hosted APIYesYes
Price & deployment
Price in /M$1.75$0.56
Price out /M$14$1.68
Blended 3:1 /M$4.81$0.84
VRAM @ Q4—405 GB
VRAM @ FP16—1340 GB
Smallest GPU (Q4)API onlyNo single GPU
~tok/s RTX 4090——
Quantizations—GGUF · FP8
Capabilities
Reasoning
Coding
Vision
Function calling
Tool use
Agentic
Benchmarks
Reasoning473.850.3——field best
Coding580.873.3——field best
Agents389.231.3——field best
Notes
Curation noteAdds GPT-5.2 Pro tier and new xhigh reasoning effort; SOTA at launch on GDPval, ARC-AGI-2, and long-context MRCRv2.Thinking mode of the hybrid V3.1 checkpoint; served via deepseek-reasoner, faster than R1-0528 at similar quality
Head to head
The short answer across rating, categories, shared benchmarks and cost
Rating leaderGPT-5.2 · +578.1 Elo
Category leadsGPT-5.2 3 · DeepSeek-V3.1 (Thinking) 1 (of 4)
Shared benches (4)GPT-5.2 4
CheapestDeepSeek-V3.1 (Thinking) · 5.7× cheaper
NewestGPT-5.2 · Dec 2025 · 3mo newer
Runs locallyDeepSeek-V3.1 (Thinking)
Best valueDeepSeek-V3.1 (Thinking) · 1100 Elo/$
Capability profile
Normalized against the tracked field · only categories a selected model was tested on
PREF hidden — untested by all selected models, so not charted.
Field context
Frontier Elo vs. output price across the priced field — compared models are labeled. Click a point: fills the first open slot, or opens the model's page when the table is full (or it's already in).
Scores carry per-row provenance (self-reported marks are flagged) — see methodology · data as of October 10, 2026.