Model
Model explorer

Qwen3.6-27B

OPEN
Alibaba · Qwen3.6 family · released Apr 22, 2026

Not in the original flagged leads, but discovered via direct primary-source research (qwen.ai/blog and github.com/QwenLM/Qwen3.6) while verifying the flagged models -- and arguably the single most important model actually missing, since it is explicitly billed by Alibaba as surpassing the prior open-weight flagship Qwen3.5-397B-A17B (15x its parameter count) on every major agentic-coding benchmark despite being fully dense at 27B params.

ReasoningCodingVisionFunction callingTool useAgentic
1950.3
Elo · rank #91
Parameters
27B
Active params
Undisclosed
Context
256K tokens
Architecture
Hybrid-attention dense model (Qwen3-Next lineage, no MoE routing): 64 layers, 16x(3x(Gated DeltaNet -> FFN) -> 1x(Gated Attention -> FFN)); hidden dim 5120, FFN intermediate dim 17408; natively multimodal (Causal LM with built-in vision encoder)
License
Apache 2.0
Languages
—
API price (in/out)
$0.6 / $3.6
Modalities
text · vision
Benchmark results
Bar shows position within the tracked field; marker = field best
AIMEMath94.1%#23
best: GPT-5.2 · 100.0%
AndroidWorldAgents70.3%#5
best: Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash · 87.1%
C-EvalKnowledge91.4%#11
best: Qwen3.6-Plus · 93.3%
CharXivVision78.4%#21
best: Qwen3.8-Flash-Next · 90.6%
DeepSearchQAAgents71.1%#6
best: GPT-5.6 Sol · 93.0%
DeepSWECoding13.3%#27
best: Gemini 4 Argon · 77.9%
GAIA2Agents40.0%#2
best: Muse Glimmer 30B · 43.3%
GPQA DiamondReasoning87.8%#48
best: GPT-6 Astra · 96.0%
Humanity's Last ExamReasoning24.0%#72
best: Claude Opus 5.5 · 67.7%
JobBenchAgents21.8%#12
best: Claude Opus 5 · 65.7%
LiveCodeBenchCoding83.9%#32
best: DeepSeek-V4-Pro (Think Max) · 93.5%
MathVistaVision87.4%#5
best: Seed 2.1 Pro · 90.7%
MMBench (English)Vision92.3%#5
best: Qwen3.5-397B-A17B · 93.7%
MMLU-ProKnowledge86.2%#22
best: Claude Fable 5 · 91.5%
MMLU-ReduxKnowledge93.5%#11
best: Qwen3.7-Max · 95.0%
MMLUKnowledge84.5%#63
best: OpenAI o3 · 92.9%
MMMU-ProVision75.8%#28
best: Claude Opus 4.7 · 85.5%
MMMUVision82.9%#16
best: Claude Fable 5 · 89.3%
NL2RepoCoding36.2%#9
best: DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash · 64.0%
OCRBenchVision89#17
best: InternVL3-78B · 906
OSWorld-VerifiedAgents63.9%#23
best: Claude Fable 5 · 85.0%
RefCOCOVision92.5%#8
best: Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus · 95.0%
SciCodeCoding39.8%#4
best: Step 5 Preview · 58.9%
ScreenSpot-ProVision76.1%#4
best: GPT-6 Astra · 92.7%
SuperGPQAReasoning66.0%#9
best: Qwen3.7-Max · 73.6%
SWE-bench ProCoding53.5%#43
best: Claude Opus 5.5 · 89.9%
SWE-bench VerifiedCoding70.0%#76
best: Claude Opus 5 · 97.0%
Terminal-Bench 2.0Coding59.3%#50
best: DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash · 90.6%
Video-MMEVision87.7%#5
best: Seed 2.1 Pro · 89.2%
WebArena-VerifiedAgents48.8%#3
best: Qwen3.8-27B · 64.8%
Run it locally
VRAM @ Q4
—
VRAM @ FP16
—
Fits on (Q4)
Multi-node cluster required
Throughput data unavailable.
Quantizations
—
Fine-tune it
Permissive
QLoRA19.0 GB1× RTX 3090 24GB
LoRA58.2 GB1× A100 80GB
Full fine-tune434.0 GB4× H200 141GB
QLoRA SFT on ~10k samples ≈ $13.91 (1× RTX 3090 24GB)
API price $0.6/$3.6 · each benchmark row carries its own source badge (see methodology)